Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Soto-Harold
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 23, 2008PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 8, 2007, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.
*1120Claimant worked as a field representative for a pharmaceutical company for approximately three years. She was provided a gas card to use while on company business. After reviewing the records of claimant’s gas card usage, the president of the company noticed unrelated charges and confronted claimant, informing her that she wished to meet with her the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re the Claim of GramonteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re the Claim of TubiakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re the Claim of IllerbrunAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re the Claim of PunzalanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re KellyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re the Claim of EspositoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re the Claim of GastonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re the Claim of HarringtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- In re the Claim of HarringtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012