Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Muhammad v. Muhammad-Rahmah

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 27, 1997No. 1-96-1665PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Zwick

Plaintiff sought leave to file an action sounding in quo warranta, alleging that defendants had improperly assumed directorships and corporate offices of the Muhammad Islamic Corporation and had acted without authority in removing plaintiff as president and chairman of the board of directors of the corporation. Upon defendants’ motion, the trial court denied plaintiff’s request to bring suit, finding that resolution of plaintiff’s claims required the court to interpret Islamic religious doctrine. Plaintiff has appealed, contending that the court abused its discretion in denying him leave to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Watson v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Jones v. WolfSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. People Ex Rel. Hansen v. PhelanIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Lowe v. First Presbyterian ChurchIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  5. St. Mark Coptic Orthodox Church v. TaniosAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Muhammad v. Muhammad-RahmahAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  2. Ervin v. Lilydale Progressive Missionary Baptist ChurchAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  3. Diocese of Quincy v. Episcopal ChurchAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
  4. The Diocese of Quincy v. The Episcopal ChurchAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
  5. Foundation for the Advancement of Catholic Schools, Inc. v. BlairConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API