Legal Opinion

Ex parte Naranjo Baldivia

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 25, 1987No. 07-86-0241-CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOYD, Justice.

Appellant brings this appeal from the denial by the trial court of relief sought by him under two applications for writ of ha-beas corpus and a motion to dismiss. In three points, appellant says the trial court erred (1) in denying his writ of habeas corpus based upon the prohibition against double jeopardy provided by the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, article one, section fourteen of the Texas Constitution, and article 1.01 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure; (2) in denying appellant’s motion to dismiss for lack of a speedy trial in contravention of…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. United States v. Loud HawkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Becky Salazar v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2004
  2. Becky Salazar v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2004
  3. Becky Salazar v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2004
  4. Dixon, Ex Parte Thomas MichaelTexas Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API