Whitlow v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtRige, J.
Appellant was convicted of the offense of obtaining property by false pretenses. Code 1923, § 4131.
The indictment was not due to be quashed - -neither were the demurrers to it due to bo sustained — on the grounds assigned in the motion to quash, and in the demurrers interposed, all said grounds taken together, amounting to no more than that “the indictment does not conclude against the peace and dignity of the State of Alabama.”
The said indictment did conclude “against the peace and dignity of Alabama,” and, since “the State of Alabama” is named in the caption of same, the manner of its…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Watson v. AdamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. McCallumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Meek v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
- Atwell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879