Legal Opinion

Kimberg v. Murray

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1926No. Docket No. 19PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

Defendants seek by certiorari review and reversal of an order by the department of labor and industry awarding plaintiff, Emma Kimberg, for herself and children compensation for the accidental death of her husband, David Kimberg, while he was engaged at cutting into saw-logs timber standing on land belonging to defendant Murray. Deceased was working at piecework for one William O’Neil, who was a woods jobber operating under a contract with defendant Murray in cutting and logging the forest products on land belonging to Murray in Menominee county. His contract with Murray included saw-logs,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gall v. Detroit Journal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Carleton v. Foundry & Machine Products Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Zoltowski v. Ternes Coal & Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Odle v. Charcoal Iron Co. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Polka v. Lynch Timber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Marchand v. RussellMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Eberly v. Sanders Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Begovac v. Northwestern Cooperage & Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Stevenson v. Antrim Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Stevenson v. Antrim Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API