Legal Opinion

Majestic Loose Leaf, Inc. v. Cannizzaro

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1957PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnthony J. Di Giovanna, J.

Motions to dismiss the amended complaint pnrsnant to subdivision 4 of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, for legal insufficiency and for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice.

The amended complaint contains two causes of action. The first, by all the plaintiffs against both defendants, alleges that plaintiffs Majestic Loose Leaf, Inc., and The Camille Company, Inc., are domestic corporations, all the stock of which was owned *1041by Harry Li Castri, deceased; that plaintiff Majestic Loose Leaf, Inc., is engaged in the business of manufacturing leather…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Stevenson v. News Syndicate Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1950
  2. Hammond v. . PennockNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Newton v. . PorterNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  4. Schmittler v. . SimonNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  5. American Sugar Refining Co. v. FancherNew York Court of Appeals · 1895

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. Town of HuntingtonNew York Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Cohen v. GordonNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Nussenblatt v. NussenblattNew York Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API