Commonwealth v. Goldman
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
This is an appeal from judgment of sentence for receiving stolen property.1 Appellant asserts that the trial court erred in admitting into evidence an inculpatory declaration against *88interest.2 For the reasons that follow, we reverse judgment of sentence and remand the case for a new trial.
The relevant facts are as follows. On January 15, 1991, appellant purchased an IBM PS2 computer from two individuals who brought the computer to appellant’s house at 11:30 p.m. The computer had been stolen earlier that evening from the place of employment of one of the individuals. The next…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. StorySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. BradySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. LivelySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth v. ColonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. SopotaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Commonwealth v. StatumSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001