Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Goldman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 8, 1993No. 975PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

This is an appeal from judgment of sentence for receiving stolen property.1 Appellant asserts that the trial court erred in admitting into evidence an inculpatory declaration against *88interest.2 For the reasons that follow, we reverse judgment of sentence and remand the case for a new trial.

The relevant facts are as follows. On January 15, 1991, appellant purchased an IBM PS2 computer from two individuals who brought the computer to appellant’s house at 11:30 p.m. The computer had been stolen earlier that evening from the place of employment of one of the individuals. The next…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StorySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Commonwealth v. BradySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Commonwealth v. LivelySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Commonwealth v. ColonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Commonwealth v. SopotaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. StatumSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API