Legal Opinion
Gilliam v. Randall
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 26, 1926No. Appeal, 134PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
This is an appeal from the refusal to issue a preliminary injunction; the record fails to show a plain abuse of discretion, and under such circumstances we do not disturb the decree: for authorities see Lesher v. Gassner Co., 285 Pa. 43.
The decree is affirmed at cost of appellants.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lesher v. Thomas S. Gassner Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
3Cited by3 opinions
- Trainer v. International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees, Local No. 516Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Kaufman v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Commonwealth to Use v. GilliamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929