State v. J. S. W. (In re J. S. W.)
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtShorr, J.
*422Youth appeals a judgment and order of the juvenile court denying his motion to set aside a 1995 juvenile delinquency adjudication for conduct that, if committed by an adult, would constitute sexual abuse in the first degree, ORS 163.427, and sodomy in the second degree, ORS 163.395. Youth argued in *483his motion that the adjudication was invalid because he had not knowingly or voluntarily waived his right to counsel or entered a valid plea due to the juvenile court's alleged failure to inform him of a potential statutory defense and a collateral consequence-mandatory sex-offender registration-of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Chaidez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Iowa v. TovarSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dept. of Human Services v. J. S.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
- Dept. of Human Services v. J. S.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2025