Legal Opinion

In re Page

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1911No. 16,955PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Original application for writ of babeas corpus.

1Opinion of the CourtReese, C. J.

This is a companion case with In re Agnew, p. 306, post, and In re King, ante, p. 298, all having been submitted upon the same “agreed stipulation of facts,” argued at the same time, and submitted on the same briefs.

Before entering upon a discussion of the case, we wish to enter our most emphatic disapproval of the manner of submission upon the so-called “agreed stipulation of facts,” and to say that, had we known before argument of what we would have to encounter in the persual of the “stipulation of facts,” we certainly should have refused to allow the cases to be submitted thereon, and…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hoagland v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Purchase v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API