Legal Opinion

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports

Decided May 16, 1996Published

1Opinion of the Court

The Honorable Stuart Vess State Representative 6717 Pontiac Drive North Little Rock, Arkansas 72116

Dear Representative Vess:

This opinion is being issued in response to your recent question regarding teacher salaries.

The basis for your question is a scenario in which a school district and a teacher enter into a contract under the terms of which the school year is to consist of 185 days, and the teacher is to receive an agreed-upon salary. At the end of that school year, the district tenders a contract to the teacher for the following school year. Under the terms of the new contract, the school…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cheqnet Systems, Inc. v. State Board of Collection AgenciesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  2. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. of Ark. v. WrightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API