(PC) Camposeco v. Stamper
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SAMUEL CAMPOSECO, Case No. 1:19-cv-01330-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS TO SUPPLEMENT THE FIRST AMENDED 13 v. COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE 14 BOUDREAUX, et al., (ECF Nos. 13, 14) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Samuel Camposeco (“Plaintiff”) is a pretrial detainee proceeding pro se and in 18 forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s first amended 19 complaint has not yet been screened. 20 Currently before the Court are Plaintiff’s motion to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Amerisourcebergen Corporation v. Dialysist West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006