Legal Opinion

King v. Walsh

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 23, 1934No. 23278PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. It is only the recitals of fact and the historical happen-

ings upon which an assignment of error is based, and not the conclusions either of law or fact recited in connection with the assignments of error and which are alleged as grounds of error, that require approval or verification. The so-called “general grounds” of error require no approval or verification. Harris v. State, 120 Ga. 196 (47 S. E. 573); Courson v. Pearson, 132 Ga. 698 (64 S. E. 997) ; Hopkins v. Jackson, 147 Ga. 821 (95 S. E. 675) ; Bacon v. Howard, 19 Ga. App. 660 (91 S. E. 1066) ; Humphrey v. State, 24 Ga. App. 22 (99…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Courson v. PearsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  2. Cooper v. MeadersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  3. Humphrey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
  4. Bacon v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  5. Hopkins v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Shelton v. DosterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API