Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Wheeler v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 10, 2011No. 5D10-1994Published

1ConcurrenceTorpy, J.

I agree that the search of Appellant’s vehicle was not authorized by the warrant because it was not located within the “cur-tilage.” See Hartpenee v. State, 509 So.2d 975 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987). Had the warrant authorized searches of vehicles anywhere on the “premises,” the result might have been different-at least as to the issue raised by Appellant. The more interesting question to me is the one that was not raised or argued: whether the police have the authority to search a vehicle, even if located within the curtilage, when there is no reason to suspect a connection to the illegal activity.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. United States v. Dennis Mikel ColeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  3. United States v. Michel Joseph NapoliCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  4. United States v. Jesus TamariCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. Bruce T. GottschalkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API