Legal Opinion

Mirror Co. v. . Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 9, 1911Published

1Opinion

This is a motion to dismiss the appeal or to affirm the judgment below in favor of the plaintiff, because the defendant did not prepare and serve its case on appeal in time. It appears that, by consent of the appellee, the plaintiff, it was allowed thirty days after the adjournment of the court on 26 February, 1911, to serve the case on appeal, but it was not served within the extended period. An unfortunate dispute between counsel as to an alleged further extension of time, by agreement between defendant's and one of appellee's (plaintiff's) counsel, has brought into this Court a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sondley v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  2. Hemphill v. MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API