Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bartelli v. O'BRIEN

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 29, 1999No. 2-98-0460Published

1DissentJustice Geiger

I respectfully dissent. I do not believe that a landowner has a common-law duty to install and maintain smoke detectors and fire extinguishers in order to reduce the possibility that a fire starting upon his premises will spread to an adjacent property. I also do not believe that a landowner must protect an adjacent landowner from injury arising out of an intentional act of arson.

At common law, a landowner was not required to anticipate a fire upon his premises. Dodd v. Nazarowski, 4 Ill. App. 3d 173, 177-78 (1972). Therefore, in the absence of some statute, rule, or regulation, a landowner…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kalata v. Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Galayda v. PenmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  3. Hill v. Charlie Club, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  4. Webster v. HeimAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  5. Aetna Insurance v. 3 Oaks Wrecking & Lumber Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API