Thompson v. United States
District Court, N.D. Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM M. ACKER, JR., District Judge.
Before the court could rule on the motion of plaintiffs, Daniel W. Thompson and Linda G. Thompson (“the Thompsons”), to tax costs against defendant, the United States of America (“the United States”), the parties entered a stipulation for taxation of costs for an amount less than the Thompsons had requested in their motion. Strangely, the Thompsons did not petition for attorneys fees. The court invited the United States to respond to the Thomp-sons’ motion by explaining why its position was substantially justified. Instead, the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Helvering v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Lewis v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Nelson J. Elliott v. Samuel SwartwoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1836
- Diane S. Blodgett v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Adkins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Adkins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
- Adkins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016