Legal Opinion

United States v. Border Brokerage Co.

United States Customs Court

Decided May 27, 1971No. A.R.D. 288PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Maletz, Judge:

The issue in this case concerns the proper value for duty purposes of a model of a telephonic “small call distributing-system” that was manufactured and sold by the Northern Electric Co., Ltd. of Ontario, Canada (Northern Electric), and imported into this country in June 1962 by appellee as customs broker for the account of the purchaser, Bell Telephone Laboratories of New York (Bell).

The imported model was appraised by the government on the basis of “cost of production” under section 402a(f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (19…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fergus Imported Cars, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  2. National Tube Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
  3. National Tube Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  4. Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  5. F. W. Myers & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bendix Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977
  2. Chrysler Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API