Legal Opinion

DePung v. City of St. Louis

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 20, 1968No. 32858PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLEMENS, Commissioner.

The plaintiff motorist, Mrs. Lorraine A. DePung, was injured when she drove off the street and into a tree while trying to dodge *510a partly lighted barricade and excavation in the defendant City’s street. She got a $2,000 verdict and judgment. The City has appealed, challenging the sufficiency of plaintiff’s evidence to show that the City had constructive knowledge of the dangerous condition long enough to impute negligence to the City in failing to remedy the condition.

The parties are in accord about the underlying principles of the City’s liability. Neither questions the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Guthrie v. City of St. CharlesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  2. Peterson v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  3. Lance v. Van WinkleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
  4. Sutter v. Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1909
  5. Lampert v. Laclede Gas-Light Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1883

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chambers v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  2. Morris v. Israel Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  3. Kinder v. PursleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Fowler v. Laclede Gas CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Harris v. City of Pleasant ValleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API