Legal Opinion

People v. Hall

California Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1854PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Ch. J. Murray

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Mr. J. Heydeneeldt concurred.

The appellant, a free white citizen of this State, was convicted of murder upon the testimony of Chinese witnesses.

The point involved in this case, is the admissibility of such evidence.

The 394th section of the Act Concerning Civil Cases, provides that no Indian or Negro shall be allowed to testify as a witness in any action or proceeding in which a White person is a party.

The 14th section of the Act of April 16th, 1850, regulating Criminal Proceedings, provides that “No Black or Mulatto person, or Indian, shall…

2Cited by28 opinions

  1. Perez v. SharpCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. In Re Marriage CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Hi-Voltage Wire Works, Inc. v. City of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Castro v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Ortiz v. Bank of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1982

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API