Legal Opinion

Neal v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 26, 2006No. 1751 Sept. Term, 2004PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARBERA, Judge.

This appeal involves the Housing and Urban Development’s (“HUD”) mortgage servicing requirements. See 24 C.F.R. §§ 203.500 et seq. (1996). Those requirements were issued pursuant to the National Housing Act (“the Act”), 12 U.S.C. § 1701 (1934). 1 The issue before us is whether, notwithstanding the lack of a private right of action to enforce those regulations, a mortgagee can agree as a term of a deed of trust to comply with those requirements and, upon noncompliance, become liable to the mortgagor for breach of contract. Although we answer that question in the affirmative, we…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Myers v. KayhoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  4. Eva Mae Roberts, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Cameron-Brown Company and Federal National Mortgage AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  5. Converge Services Group, LLC v. CurranCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. v. NealCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Prison Health Services, Inc. v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  3. Flatspikes, LLC v. Softspikes, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API