Legal Opinion

Curry v. Lansing

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 30, 2002No. 01-3389Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

HENRY, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Michael L. Curry, a prisoner under military confinement, appeals from the district court’s denial of his habeas application, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. We have jurisdiction over this appeal by virtue of 28 U.S.C. § 1291. See Gometz v. United States Parole Comm’n, 294…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. William M. Lips, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Commandant, United States Disciplinary Barracks, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  2. Gometz v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API