Goelet v. Goldstein
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
By this appeal the plaintiffs seek the reversal of an order which denied a motion to direct the defendants to make their answer more definite and certain, to strike out the first, second and third defenses set up in the answer, and to dismiss the third counterclaim.'
The action is for rent. The three defenses are also set up as counterclaims.
The first alleged defense sets forth in substance that in order to induce these defendants to enter into a lease of a store and basement, the plaintiffs agreed to place said store and basement in proper shape and condition for use by these defendants in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kelsey v. . WardNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
- Ter Kuile v. MaralandNew York Supreme Court · 1894
- Reiner v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Thomson v. . SandersNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Botts v. Mercantile Bank of MemphisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Susskind v. 1136 Tenants Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1964
- Harfried Realty Co. v. Spuyten Amusement Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1934
- Conthur Development Co. v. Dacar Garage Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1983
- Jones v. Freeman's Dairy, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Capitol Auto Stores, Inc. v. Bradley, New York County Courts1956
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.