Legal Opinion

Schildnecht v. City of Joplin

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 14, 1931PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

This ease is based upon the. following verified petition, caption, signature, and affidavit, omitted:

“Plaintiffs for cause of action state that they are resident tax paying citizens of the following described territory, to-wit:
“All of section 22, and the west half of section 23, township 27, range 33, in Newton county, Missouri; that the defendant Charles A. Patterson is the duly elected, qualified and acting mayor of the city of Joplin, that Beauford F. Herron is the duly qualified and acting Commissioner of Revenue of the .city of Joplin, that the defendant R. L. Jefferies is the duly…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Grier v. Kansas City, Clay County & St. Joseph Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1921
  2. State Ex Rel. Brown v. Board of Education of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922
  3. Schildnecht v. City of JoplinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  4. Trefny v. EichenseerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  5. State Ex Rel. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co. v. GehnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. City of North Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  2. State Ex Inf. Mallett v. City of JoplinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  3. Powell v. City of JoplinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  4. Hixson v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  5. Town of Mount Carmel v. City of KingsportTennessee Supreme Court · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API