Macomber v. Moor
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtBarNes, J.
The writ in this case was sued out against the three men named in the title, as individuals and also as a copartnership, of the same name, and otherwise styled, “Moor, Foster & Hillgrove Co.”
The action is debt, upon a bond in a replevin suit of earlier date.
The plea was the general issue, not the bond of defendants, with brief statement that the property taken in replevin was at the date of replevin the property of a corporation, the Moor, Foster & Hillgrove corporation, and not the property of the individuals named above, whether as partners or in any other personal capacity, and that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Crabbs v. KoontzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1888
- Easter v. FosterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
- Fielding v. SilversteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
- O'Donnell v. ColbyIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
- Simmons v. RobinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by3 opinions
- Turon v. J. & L. CONSTRUCTION CO.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Crosswhite v. American Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
- Unger v. Hoak, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County1941