Legal Opinion

Nationwide Insurance Enterprise v. Moustakidis

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 18, 2003PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

ORIE MELVIN, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant, Anastasis Moustakidis, appeals from the July 10, 2002 Order granting Appellees’, Nationwide Insurance Enterprise and Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (Nationwide’s), petition to enforce an alleged settlement agreement relating to uninsured motorist benefits. We affirm.

¶ 2 The trial court aptly summarized the facts and procedural background as follows:

On May 2, 1996, Appellant was involved in a motor vehicle accident with an uninsured motorist. His motor vehicle was Insured by Appellee[s], under a Nationwide Century II Auto Policy (hereinafter…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Buttermore v. Aliquippa HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Smith v. Cumberland Group, Ltd.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Midomo Co. v. Presbyterian Housing Development Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Brennan v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Shadduck v. Christopher J. Kaclik, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Smay v. E.R. Stuebner, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Step Plan Services, Inc. v. KoreskoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Doherty v. DohertySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Cisneros, A. v. Rouse, F. D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Doherty v. DohertySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API