Legal Opinion
Nancy Johnson v. United States Railroad Retirement Board
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided September 11, 1992No. 90-1243, 90-5380Published
1Opinion of the Court
969 F.2d 1082
297 U.S.App.D.C. 82
Nancy JOHNSON, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD, Respondent-Appellee.
Nos. 90-1243, 90-5380.
United States Court of Appeals,
District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued Oct. 23, 1991.
Decided July 10, 1992.
Rehearing Denied Sept. 11, 1992.
Gill Deford, with whom Neal S. Dudovitz, Los Angeles, Cal., and Toby S. Edelman, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioner.
Karl T. Blank, Gen. Atty., R.R. Retirement Bd., Chicago, Ill., and Susan A. Nellor, Asst. U.S. Atty., with whom Jay B. Stephens, U.S. Atty., John D. Bates and R. Craig Lawrence,…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lorraine POLASKI, Et Al., Appellees, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.