Legal Opinion
Cranford v. City of Pasadena
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
Decided February 29, 1996No. 14-94-00938-CVPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDELMAN, Justice.
In this wrongftd death and survivorship suit, appellants 1 (the “Cranfords”) challenge a summary judgment granted in favor of the City of Pasadena (the “City”) and Harris County (the “County”) on the grounds that (1) the City and County had a duty to correct an allegedly improperly positioned strain pole with which the Cranfords’ automobile collided, and (2) fact issues existed (a) whether maintaining the strain pole in an allegedly improper location was a non-discretionary act, (b) whether the allegedly improper location of the strain pole was a premise defect or…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. S.S.Texas Supreme Court · 1993
- Montgomery v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Lowe v. Texas Tech UniversityTexas Supreme Court · 1976
- Park Place Hospital v. Estate of MiloTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Leleaux v. Hamshire-Fannett Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Texas River Barges v. City of San Antonio, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2000
- Ethio Express Shuttle Service, Inc. v. City of Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
- Smith v. Galveston County, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010
- Webb v. City of Dallas, Tex.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- City of Corpus Christi v. Absolute Industries, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.