Legal Opinion

People v. Van Aalst

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 15, 1924PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

It was necessary, to warrant a conviction, that tbe fact of tbe assault should be proved by evidence from another source than tbe defendant’s confession. Tbe record is barren of any such proof, save tbe circumstances that tbe complainant bad reported tbe defendant to tbe school authorities for an infraction of tbe rules, and that tbe defendant was present at tbe scene of tbe alleged assault. (People v. Roach, 215 N. Y. 592, 600; People v. Krauss, 192 App. Div. 403.) Tbe judgment of conviction of tbe Court of Special Sessions is, therefore, reversed on tbe law and facts, and tbe defendant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. . RoachNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. People v. KraussAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. Al HatemNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API