Legal Opinion

In re Smith

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 14, 2005PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Respondent has been charged with possession of a quantity of Alprazolam under circumstances indicating an intent to *346distribute the substance to another in violation of S.C.Code Ann. § 44-53-370(b)(3) (1985). The Office of Disciplinary Counsel has filed a petition asking this Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17(a), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, and seeking the appointment of an attorney to protect respondent’s clients’ interests pursuant to Rule 31, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR.

IT IS ORDERED that respondent’s license to practice law in this state is suspended until…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API