Legal Opinion
McLane v. McLane
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 16, 1994PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Defendant’s notice of appeal states that this appeal is taken from an order entered June 3, 1993. In the exercise of our discretion, we deem the appeal to have been taken from the subsequent judgment (see, Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988).
We agree with defendant that Supreme Court erred in failing to grant her maintenance. The court did not explicitly rule on defendant’s maintenance request.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hughes v. NussbaumerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Brown v. U.S. Vanadium Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Cooper v. CooperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Kieffer v. KiefferAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Reck v. ReckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
3Cited by5 opinions
- David K. v. Iris K.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Timperio v. TimperioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Ortiz v. OrtizAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Garrison-Horgan v. HorganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Graham v. GrahamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002