Legal Opinion

Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Rea

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1997No. 96-1433PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

In all six of the counts in this case, respondent neglected legal matters entrusted to her. In four of the counts, respondent obtained retainers which she did not earn or return. With respect to two counts, respondent lied to her clients.

In Disciplinary Counsel v. Palmer (1994), 71 Ohio St.3d 174, 642 N.E.2d 1087, when an attorney lied to clients and neglected their interests, we ordered an indefinite suspension. We also found an indefinite suspension appropriate in Disciplinary Counsel v. Chavers (1990), 55 Ohio St.3d 18, 562 N.E.2d 1386, where an attorney accepted numerous retainers, failed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. ChaversOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. PalmerOhio Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dayton Bar Ass'n v. ShamanOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. DroeOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. ReaOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Dayton Bar Assn. v. ShamanOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. DroeOhio Supreme Court · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API