Legal Opinion
Pineda v. Barnhart
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 14, 2003No. 02-16001; D.C. No. CV-01-00119-JFMPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ***
Charles Daniel Pineda, Jr., appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment affirming the Administrative Law Judge’s (“AL J”) determination that Pineda was entitled to social security benefits beginning September 1994 rather than March 1981. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. *362§ 1291. We review de novo the summary judgment, and we review for substantial evidence and legal error the ALJ’s decision. Thomas v. Barnhart, 278 F.3d 947, 954 (9th Cir.2002). We affirm.
Substantial evidence supports the ALJ’s determination that Pineda was entitled to benefits beginning in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Maureen Thomas v. Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Raymond D. Rolen v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Allene L. DRIVER, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant/AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pineda v. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecuritySupreme Court of the United States · 2003