Legal Opinion

In re Goodchild

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided April 5, 1935No. 26230PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BYERS, District Judge.

So much of the motion for an order adjudging the bankrupt in contempt as has to do with his failure to comply with the order of the referee concerning certain insurance policies will be reported back to the referee for the following reasons:

The report dated February 18, 1934, seems to contain typographical errors:

1. At the top of page 5, it is stated, in part: “and the purpose of the deposit indicates specifically that the dividends were to be used for the purpose of being applied * * Apparently the word “not” is missing.

2. In the third paragraph on the same page, the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re MessingerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Greiman v. Metropolitan Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
  2. In Re SummersUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 1988
  3. United States v. BehrensDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1955
  4. In re BermanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API