Legal Opinion

Roethemeyer v. Milton

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1936No. 26181. Department TwoPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.

This is an action by the vendees under a contract for the sale of real estate to recover money paid on the purchase price and outlays for improvements, on the ground of fraud and mutual rescission. The vendees (Roethemeyer) had previously brought an action to recover the same items on the same grounds, which action was decided adversely to them by this court. Roethemeyer v. Milton, 177 Wash. 650, 33 P. (2d) 99. In order to get the bearing of that de- cisión on the issues in this case, we shall, with as little repetition as possible, state what we regard as the material facts from the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sanders v. BrockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  2. Nicolopoolos v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. Roethemeyer v. MiltonWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Rafferty v. GastonWashington Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Morrison v. Kandler Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Miller Et Ux v. Barker Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Litel v. MarshWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Morrison v. Kandler Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API