Legal Opinion

Eureka Casualty Co. v. Henderson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 18, 1952No. Appeal, 175PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Chief Justice Hoeace Steen,

The court below correctly held that this was not a case for declaratory judgment.

A policy issued by plaintiff, Eureka Casualty Company, to defendant, May Henderson, provided that the Company would pay on behalf of the insured all sums which the latter should become obligated to pay by reason of the liability imposed upon her by law for damages sustained by any person or persons and caused by accident arising out of the ownership, maintenance or use of the premises 213 Sixth Avenue, New Kensington, Pa. These premises were a private residence of which…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kariher's Petition (No. 1)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Capital Bank and Trust Company's PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Carwithen's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Schoenbrun v. NettrourSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Kahn v. William Goldman Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. McWilliams v. McCabeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Lifter EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Keystone Insurance v. Warehousing & Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Johnson EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Ronald H. Clark, Inc. v. Township of HamiltonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API