Legal Opinion
Federal Motorship Corp. v. Johnson & Higgins
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 28, 1948PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWalter, J.
Plaintiff alleges that for a valuable consideration defendant agreed to arrange policies of marine insurance on plaintiff’s vessel, Badger State, with loss payable to plaintiff and United States of Mexico as interest may-appear, to collect the proceeds of the policies should any become due, and to pay over such proceeds to plaintiff to the extent that they were, in accordance with the terms of the policies,- payable to plaintiff; that defendant did arrange such insurance; that proceeds of the policies in the amount of $250,000 became due by reason of the vessel having become a total loss;…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Minnesota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Stanley v. SchwalbySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Ickes v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Chapman v. . ForbesNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Berlanti Construction Co. v. Republic of CubaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
- Swezey v. LynchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Oliner v. Canadian Pacific Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
- Swezey v. LynchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Federal Motorship Corp. v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.