Legal Opinion

Egard v. Chearnly

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 7, 1866PublishedCited by 5 opinions

CASE 5 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL PROM HENDERSON CIRCUIT COURT. CITED— 3 Dana, 619; Forman Sf Dana vs. Hunt, SfC. 3 Metcalfe, 546; Taylor vs. Gilpin. 2 Metcalfe, 552; Vanbussum. vs. Maloney. 2 Ben. Mon., 411; Busly vs. Hardin. 14 Vesey, 151; White vs. Wilson. CITED— 3 Dana, 622; Forman, fyc., vs. Hunt, fyc. 2 B. Mon., 411; Busly vs. Hardin. 2 Met., 552. 3 Met., 546. MSS. Op. Ky., Oct., 1860; Martin vs. Powell's heirs. Rev. Stat., chap. 26.

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE ROBERTSON

delivered the opinion oe the court:

At a commissioner’s sale of a lot in the city of Henderson, decreed to be sold in execution of a testamentary trust for the education and maintenance of the testator’s infant children, the appellant was the highest bidder at the price of $1,100.

When the commissioner’s report came up for consideration, all the devisees moved a quashal of the sale, on the sole ground of gross inadequacy of the price bid, and two of the adult devisees offered to take the lot at $3,000, as so much of their interest in the testator’s estate.

The circuit court…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Vanmeter v. Vanmeter's AssigneeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1889
  2. Buckner's Trustee v. BucknerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  3. Steele v. Wood's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  4. Richey v. HarlanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  5. W. G. Duncan Coal Co. v. GlennDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API