Legal Opinion

Wetherell v. Chicago City R. R.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 28, 1902PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Trespass on the Case, for personal injuries. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Elbkidge Hanecy, Judge presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1901.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Ball

delivered the opinion of the court.

The abstract is not so deficient that we should for that reason affirm this judgment.

The contention of appellee that the action of the trial court in directing the jury to return a verdict for appellee at the close of all the evidence should be sustained, because such evidence, “ with all the inferences the jury might justifiably draw therefrom, is not sufficient to support a verdict for the plaintiff, if one had been returned,” is not well founded.

It is sufficient to say that the evidence of appellant, supported by that of two…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. BabcockIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Holton v. DalyIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Chicago City Railway Co. v. MartensenIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Westville Coal Co. v. SchwartzIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Roberts v. Chicago & Grand Trunk Ry. Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Genslinger v. New Illinois Athletic ClubAppellate Court of Illinois · 1923
  2. Harkin v. Ferro Concrete Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1914
  3. Showen v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Susemiehl v. Red River Lumber Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1940
  5. Jensen v. ELGIN, JOLIET & EASTERN R. CO.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API