Bazzle v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Dissent
McDONALD, J.,
dissenting, in which HARRELL and BARBERA, JJ., join.
Under current Maryland law, a defendant charged with a specific intent crime is not guilty of the offense if the defendant is so intoxicated, at the time of the act, that the defendant lacked the necessary intent. State v. Gover, 267 Md. 602, 298 A.2d 378 (1973). Under Maryland Rule 4-325(c), a trial court must instruct the jury concerning intoxication and specific intent crimes if the defendant requests such an instruction and there is sufficient evidence to allow a jury to find that the defendant lacked specific intent for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Montana v. EgelhoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- State v. GoverCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Kreijanovsky v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1985
- State v. NetterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
- State v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.