Staub v. Staub
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
IFkarinc on an appeal from a decree of the Supreme Court of the .District of Columbia, sitting as an equity court, dismissing a bill for partition. Tbe facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Robb
This is an appeal from a decree in the supreme court of the District dismissing a hill for the partition of certain real estate in the District of Columbia, known as part of lot 25 in Eeatty and Howkins addition to Georgetown.
Appellants’ (Henry C. Staub, William J. Staub, Catherine Perry, et al.) claim of title is based upon a deed daled April !), 1878, from Jacob F. Staub, the then owner of the above real estate, to bis five sisters, the contention of appellants being* that they, as heirs at law of four of these sisters, are tenants in common with the appellees (Millard F. Staub, Clifton…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States ex rel. John Davis Co. v. Illinois Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1915
- National Surety Co. v. United States ex rel. Pittsburgh & Buffalo Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
- Clark v. RollerSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Palmer v. Doull Miller Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1916
- Collins v. Bradley Co.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1915
3Cited by2 opinions
- District of Columbia v. Riggs National Bank of WashingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
- Genyard v. JonesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1955