State v. James Z.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.
*1047In June 2010, prior to respondent’s anticipated release from a correctional facility, petitioner commenced this proceeding alleging that respondent is a sex offender requiring civil management (see Mental Hygiene Law § 10.06 [a]). Following a jury trial, respondent was found to be a detained sex offender with a mental abnormality as defined by the Mental Hygiene Law (see Mental Hygiene Law § 10.07 [a]). Thereafter, upon respondent’s consent, Supreme Court found that respondent was a dangerous sex offender requiring confinement and ordered him to be committed to a secure treatment facility.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. MingoNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. Timothy JJ.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- State v. Mark S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- State v. Richard VV.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- State v. Kenneth BB.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Matter of State of New York v. Ian I.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- WFE Ventures, Inc. v. MillsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Matter of State of New York v. Kenneth IIAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- State v. Donald DD.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Matter of State of New York v. Wayne J.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.