Legal Opinion
Sarango v. Attorney General of United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 30, 2011No. 10-2737PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
VAN ANTWERPEN, Circuit Judge.
Maria Sarango petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals decision dismissing her appeal. The BIA rejected Sarango’s request for retroactive — “nunc pro tunc ” — consent to reapply for admission to the United States under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(9)(C)(ii) because Congress delegated authority to consider such requests to the Secretary of Homeland Security, thereby depriving immigration judges of jurisdiction. Whether an immigration judge has jurisdiction to consider a § 1182(a)(9)(C)(ii) request for consent to reapply for admission is an…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Aguirre-AguirreSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Kevin L. Barden v. Patrick Keohane, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Gonzales v. Department of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Yusupov v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Elias Eid v. John ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- LEMUSBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2012
- Nelson v. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Gustavo Nunez-Moron v. Eric HolderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Ali Fares Samara v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.