Legal Opinion

Goldrick v. Roxana Petroleum Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 17, 1918No. 9323PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from District Court, Tulsa County; Conn Linn, Judge. Action by the Roxana Petroleum Company of Oklahoma and the Roxana Petroleum Corporation against O. Y. Goldrick and others. Judgments for plaintiffs, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

DAVIS, C.

The parties to this action will be referred to as they appeared in the lower court, that is, the defendants in error as plaintiffs, and plaintiffs in error as defendants.

The plaintiffs ar.e two corporations engaged in the production of oil, and for some years prior to the institution of this action O. Y. Goldrick and W. C. Baker were in the .employ of plaintiffs. The duties of Mr. Goldrick and Mr. Baker were to examine oil leases which the plaintiffs wer.e desirous of purchasing. The plaintiffs relied in a large measure upon the judgment of Mr. Goldrick and Mr. Baker as to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McCoy v. McCoySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Blake v. O'NealWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. People v. BordeauxIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Borchert v. BorchertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Chaves v. MyerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sandpiper North Apartments, Ltd. v. American National Bank & Trust Co. of ShawneeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. Lewis v. SchaferSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  3. Rollow v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Holmes v. McKeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  5. W. R. Pickering Lumber Co. v. SherrittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API