State v. Brush

Defendant was convicted of unlawfully manufacturing intoxicating liquors, and has appealed from the judgment and from an order denying him a new trial.

1. The statute under which this prosecution was had (Chap. 9, Laws of Extraordinary Session 1921) is attacked on the ground that it was enacted at an extraordinary session of the legislative assembly, and the subject matter was not included in the governor’s proclamation. The question was determined adversely to defendant’s contention in State v. Dishman, 64 Mont. 530, 210 Pac. 604.

2. The only other assignment raises the question of the suffi…