Kosovsky v. Zahl
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
David B. Saxe, J.
The defendant husband, toward the conclusion of this drawn-out custody case, moves for production by plaintiff of all films, videotapes, audiotapes, transcripts and memoranda thereof, or photographs taken during surveillance of him. *165Plaintiff protests that the request is improper and comes too late.
This is not a typical situation, in which surveillance tapes are sought by a plaintiff during discovery so as to permit the plaintiff to test their authenticity for purposes of countering defenses raised at trial. Defendant acknowledges that he seeks these…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- DiMichel v. South Buffalo Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Boulware v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1994
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rotundi v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Johnson v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- M.C. v. R.C.New York Supreme Court · 2008