Legal Opinion

Kosovsky v. Zahl

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1995PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

David B. Saxe, J.

The defendant husband, toward the conclusion of this drawn-out custody case, moves for production by plaintiff of all films, videotapes, audiotapes, transcripts and memoranda thereof, or photographs taken during surveillance of him. *165Plaintiff protests that the request is improper and comes too late.

This is not a typical situation, in which surveillance tapes are sought by a plaintiff during discovery so as to permit the plaintiff to test their authenticity for purposes of countering defenses raised at trial. Defendant acknowledges that he seeks these…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. DiMichel v. South Buffalo Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Boulware v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rotundi v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. M.C. v. R.C.New York Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API