People v. Barboni
New York Court of Appeals
1Concurrence
Smith, J. (concurring).
I concur in the result the majority reaches, but not in its reasoning. I do not think this case fits with our depraved indifference jurisprudence as it has developed over the last decade. Rather, I think that a case like this—a severe beating that killed an infant—is a justified, narrow exception to the rule established by our recent cases that a depraved indifference murder conviction cannot be sustained unless a *408jury could find, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the defendant was literally indifferent to whether the victim lived or died.
This is the first case since…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- People v. SuarezNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- People v. RegisterNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. FeingoldNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. PayneNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- People v. SanchezNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.