Legal Opinion · Concurrence

People v. Barboni

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 11, 2013Published

1Concurrence

Smith, J. (concurring).

I concur in the result the majority reaches, but not in its reasoning. I do not think this case fits with our depraved indifference jurisprudence as it has developed over the last decade. Rather, I think that a case like this—a severe beating that killed an infant—is a justified, narrow exception to the rule established by our recent cases that a depraved indifference murder conviction cannot be sustained unless a *408jury could find, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the defendant was literally indifferent to whether the victim lived or died.

This is the first case since…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. SuarezNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. People v. RegisterNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. People v. FeingoldNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. People v. PayneNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. People v. SanchezNew York Court of Appeals · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API