Legal Opinion

Cuticchia v. Town of Andover

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided April 3, 2019No. AC 18-P-571PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMilkey, J.

*121 *705 In 2016, the town of Andover increased the percentage share that retired town employees had to pay for their health insurance. Three retired town employees brought this action alleging that G. L. c. 32B, § 22 ( e ), prohibited the town from implementing such increases prior to July 1, 2018. 3 On cross motions for summary judgment, a Superior Court judge ruled that *122 the language of § 22 ( e ) unambiguously supported the town's position that the increases were lawful. For the reasons that follow, we vacate the judgment.

1. Statutory background . A municipality may, but is not required to,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Kobrin v. GastfriendMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  2. Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  3. Commonwealth v. RaposoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  4. Bartlett v. Greyhound Real Estate Finance Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
  5. Connors v. AnninoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Main Street Mortgage Group, Corp. v. TranMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API