Legal Opinion

Clingman v. Hill

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 11, 1919No. 22,075PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Sumner district court; Oliver P. Fuller, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

The purpose of this action was to trace and reclaim a trust fund belonging to the estate of an insane person, which had 'been misappropriated and invested in real estate.

*146In his petition, Ord Clingman, as guardian of the estate of Amanuel Hill, alleged, in substance, that W. V. Hill, a former guardian of the estate, had used assets of the estate to purchase a drug store in Lawrence, Kan., taking the title in his own name; that afterwards he used additional funds to replenish the stock of the store; and that subsequently he exchanged the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Myers v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  2. Kansas State Bank v. First State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  3. Reeves v. PierceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  4. Hubbard v. Alamo Irrigating & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  5. Eastern Kansas Oil Co. v. BeutnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. McCandliss Construction Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  2. Kline v. OrebaughSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  3. Herthel v. BarthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  4. Secrest v. OrganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  5. Alumbaugh v. HedgesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API