Clingman v. Hill
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Sumner district court; Oliver P. Fuller, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnston, C. J.:
The purpose of this action was to trace and reclaim a trust fund belonging to the estate of an insane person, which had 'been misappropriated and invested in real estate.
*146In his petition, Ord Clingman, as guardian of the estate of Amanuel Hill, alleged, in substance, that W. V. Hill, a former guardian of the estate, had used assets of the estate to purchase a drug store in Lawrence, Kan., taking the title in his own name; that afterwards he used additional funds to replenish the stock of the store; and that subsequently he exchanged the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Myers v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
- Kansas State Bank v. First State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
- Reeves v. PierceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
- Hubbard v. Alamo Irrigating & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1894
- Eastern Kansas Oil Co. v. BeutnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- McCandliss Construction Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
- Kline v. OrebaughSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
- Herthel v. BarthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
- Secrest v. OrganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
- Alumbaugh v. HedgesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.