United States v. Randolph Louis Tate and Ronald Steve Delgado
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GODBOLD, Circuit Judge:
This is an entrapment case.
In the pretrial order entrapment was noted as the sole defense. In its opening statement the government attempted to discuss the anticipated defense of entrapment. The court would not permit discussion but itself noted that the defense was anticipated. After the government rested its direct case, the defendants moved, pursuant to Roviaro v. U. S., 353 U.S. 53, 77 S.Ct. 623, 1 L.Ed.2d 639 (1957), and U. S. v. Gomez-Rojas, 507 F.2d 1213 (CA5, 1975), to have the identity of the informer revealed and to have him produced so that they could put him…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Hampton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Edward Rodriguez, A/K/A Rick, Thomas J. Albernaz, Peter Smigowski, and William John MartinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Michael A. WolffsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Dean HillCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- State v. CookLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
- United States v. Gregory James ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.